DePuy Hip Settlements | Pinnacle Hip Lawsuit Settlement

Many Paths Lead to DePuy Hip Settlements

J. Cooper Carlisle | June 21st, 2011

The U.S. court system has recently become a multiple arena of DePuy hip litigation. DePuy hip lawsuits have been filed in state and federal courts, both as individual cases and as class actions. Some cases have been steered into mass tort, others into multi-district litigation or MDL. Meanwhile, substantial DePuy hip settlements have been, and continue to be, negotiated outside of the courtroom.

Given this flurry of judicial activity, many patients are seeking straightforward DePuy hip recall advice from a DePuy hip lawyer. Potential plaintiffs want statistics about previous DePuy hip settlements, and also to find the best legal strategy for how their own cases can result in a fair and deserving DePuy ASR or Pinnacle hip lawsuit settlement.

DePuy ASR Hip voluntary recall

After its voluntary recall of the faulty DePuy ASR acetabular hip in 2010, manufacturer DePuy Orthopaedics, a sub-unit of Johnson and Johnson, offered to pay the “reasonable and customary” medical costs of many of the thousands of defective implant recipients. No compensation for pain and suffering or loss of livelihood was discussed.

Many patients reportedly received a letter from the hip maker offering only to cover the individual’s insurance co-pay. A DePuy lawyer with experience negotiating DePuy hip settlements will likely advise patients who require revision surgery that they are legally entitled to much more than just this base-level compensation.

DePuy Hip lawsuits

Meanwhile, courts around the country are filled with DePuy hip lawsuits. Over 250 federal ASR hip lawsuits have been consolidated into multi-district litigation in Ohio, while ASR lawsuits filed in state courts have been centralized for pre-trial proceedings in New Jersey.

DePuy Pinnacle Hip lawsuit settlements

Plaintiffs seeking DePuy Pinnacle hip lawsuit settlements have launched additional litigation. DePuy’s Pinnacle hip model is of a similar “ball in socket” design to the ASR acetabular device, though while the latter is exclusively metal-on-metal, the Pinnacle hip system comes in a variety of arrangements, such as metal-on-metal and metal-on-ceramic. Approximately 60 federal Pinnacle hip lawsuits have been consolidated into MDL in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas and are now advancing towards trial.

DePuy Hip settlements sought through class action lawsuits

Some patients have followed alternative DePuy hip recall advice, and are seeking DePuy hip settlements by joining one of several national class action lawsuits, which reportedly aim only to legally compel the hip maker to pay for medical expenses associated with testing for DePuy hip side effects such as device dislocation and metal poisoning.

DePuy class action lawsuits can take longer than individual cases

Though cases absorbed into a class action or federal MDL generally reach a higher percentage of pre-trial settlements, some DePuy hip lawyers warn that these cases can often take much longer to reach resolution than an individual case tried in state court. Plaintiffs in MDL also run the risk that their individual cases, each with its own unique set of circumstances, allegations, and injuries, will become lost in the anonymity of the litigation crowd, and furthermore will be dependent on verdicts and jury-awarded damages in cases which they might only superficially resemble.

The end result could feasibly be diminished DePuy hip settlements.